On this pageJump to a section
A court just handed lead generators a win. Do not celebrate by deleting your checkbox.
On January 24, 2025 the Eleventh Circuit threw out the FCC's one-to-one consent rule, days before it was due to take effect. It is real news, and it is also the kind of news that gets turned into "consent doesn't matter anymore" by people who never read past the headline. That is the wrong takeaway, and an expensive one.
This is not legal advice. Talk to a TCPA attorney about your setup. Have a TCPA attorney review your actual forms and flows.
What did the Eleventh Circuit actually vacate?
The FCC had amended its rules so that consent to receive marketing calls and texts would apply to one identified seller at a time. It also required that the messages be logically and topically related to the interaction that prompted the consent. The idea was to close what the agency called the lead generator loophole.1
The court's reasoning
The court held that the FCC exceeded its statutory authority. The TCPA does not define "prior express consent," so the court looked to the ordinary, common-law meaning: a person need only clearly and unmistakably state, before the call, that they are willing to receive it. Adding extra restrictions went beyond that.12
Timing
The decision came on January 24, 2025, just before the January 27, 2025 effective date.2 The FCC had also moved to postpone the rule's effective date to January 26, 2026 pending judicial review, according to Morrison Foerster.1 With the rule vacated, that postponement no longer matters in practice.
What still applies after the ruling?
Quite a lot. This is the part to print out.
Prior express written consent is still the baseline
According to Kelley Drye, the FCC's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau stated that the previous prior express written consent requirements remain in effect.2 The FCC's own description of the TCPA says telemarketers must obtain prior express written consent before robocalling consumers.4
Other parts of the same order are not affected
The vacatur did not touch other changes in the December 2023 order, such as text-blocking requirements for wireless carriers and extending the National Do Not Call Registry to text messages. Kelley Drye also notes that new revocation-of-consent rules were scheduled to take effect April 11, 2025, and the bureau's action did not address them.2
Carriers and platforms are a separate authority
Morrison Foerster points out that wireless carriers, third-party messaging providers and industry guidelines still apply.1 Kelley Drye adds that partner contracts may still carry one-to-one commitments.2 CTIA's messaging principles say an opt-in should apply only to the campaign and sender it was obtained for, and that senders should not use rented, sold or shared opt-in lists.3
Message Senders should create and vet their own opt-in lists.
What does a good consent block look like?
CTIA lists what a clear call to action should make plain: the program or product, the phone number or short code messages come from, the specific identity of the organization or person, clear language about opt-in and any fees, and other terms such as how to opt out and the privacy policy.3 Opt-in details should not be buried in terms and conditions.
| Weak consent | Strong consent |
|---|---|
| Pre-checked box | Unchecked box the person ticks themselves |
| "I agree to receive offers" | States who will contact them, how (call or text) and about what |
| Buried in terms of service | Sits next to the button, in plain type |
| No way out stated | Says how to stop (for example, reply STOP) |
| One checkbox for many partners | One named sender for the thing they asked for |
Write down what the person saw
CTIA also recommends retaining records of opt-in consent: the timestamp, the medium, the language and action used to secure consent, the specific campaign, and the IP address.3 If consent is ever questioned, the record is your defense. A memory is not.
- Person reads the consent textSender, channel and topic are named
- Person ticks an unchecked boxTheir own action
- Record is storedTimestamp, form version, text and source
- Message goes outWith a clear way to stop
- Opt-out is honoredImmediately, and logged
Should you buy or share leads differently now?
If you buy leads, or pass them to partners, this is the question the ruling does not answer for you: whose consent is it? CTIA's principles say a consumer opt-in should not be transferable or assignable, and should apply only to the campaigns and the specific sender it was obtained for.3 A lead that was collected for one company and handed to another is exactly where that principle bites.
Three questions for any lead source
- What did the person see when they opted in? Ask for the form, the consent text and the date.
- Which sender did they agree to hear from? If it was not you, you are borrowing someone else's permission.
- Can you show the record on request? If the vendor cannot, assume you cannot either.
Cheap leads with fuzzy consent are not cheap. They are deferred cost with interest.
What about AI voice and automated follow-up?
If you are planning to add AI voice calls to your follow-up (read AI Voice Agents for Appointment Setting first), note what the FCC announced on February 8, 2024: calls made with AI-generated voices are "artificial" under the TCPA, and the same consent standards apply.4 The technology changes how the call sounds. It does not change who has to say yes first.
How do you tighten your consent flow this week?
- Open your live form on a phone (the plain-language habits match what I describe for intake consent). Read the consent text as a stranger would. Is it obvious who will contact them, and how?
- Uncheck any pre-checked box. The person should do the ticking.
- Name the sender. If three companies will contact them, say so, or restructure so one does.
- Add a stop instruction to every text and a clear opt-out path for calls and email.
- Store the evidence. Keep timestamp, form version, consent text and source with each lead record.
- Ask your partners and platforms what they require. Get it in writing, and compare it with what you do.
Why does this matter for revenue, not just risk?
Because a clean consent flow is a conversion asset. People who clearly agreed to hear from you answer, show up and buy, which feeds the booked-to-showed rate. People who were tricked into a checkbox complain, block and report you, and carriers notice.
That is consent as infrastructure. It sits underneath your follow-up, your sales calls and your reputation. Fix it while the news is fresh and nobody is pressuring you. If you want a second pair of eyes on your lead flow, reach out.
Keep building.Ekai
Questions people ask
Is the FCC's one-to-one consent rule in effect?
No. On January 24, 2025 the Eleventh Circuit vacated the one-to-one consent amendment and sent it back to the FCC, days before its January 27, 2025 effective date. The earlier prior express written consent requirements remain in place.
What did the one-to-one rule require?
It would have limited a consumer's consent to calls and texts from one identified seller at a time, and required that the messages be logically and topically related to the interaction that prompted the consent.
Do I still need consent to text or call leads?
Yes. The ruling removed the new restrictions. It did not remove the existing requirement for prior express written consent for telemarketing calls and texts, and carriers and messaging platforms keep their own consent standards.
Why do carriers still care about one-to-one consent?
Carrier and industry guidelines are separate from the FCC rule. CTIA's messaging principles, for example, say an opt-in should apply only to the campaign and sender it was obtained for, and that senders should not use rented, sold or shared opt-in lists.
Sources
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
